New USPTO Pilot Program Expands Amendment After Final Consideration

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently announced the launch of the After Final Consideration Pilot (AFCP). The new initiative authorizes a limited amount of non-production time for examiners to consider responses filed after a final rejection.

The USPTO is specifically seeking to determine if the program will increase the number of patent applications that are allowed at that point in prosecution and reduce the number of Requests for Continued Examination (RCEs). Currently, the USPTO is currently facing an enormous backlog of RCEs and other patent requests.

“Compact prosecution is one of our top goals,” said Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the USPTO, David Kappos. “The AFCP pilot will allow some additional flexibility for applicants and examiners to work together in after final situations to move applications toward allowance.”

According to the Guidelines for Consideration of Responses After Final Rejection under 37 CFR 1.116(b), situations where after a full and complete review, a response after final rejection should be entered include:

  1. The amendment places the application in condition for allowance by canceling claims or complying with formal requirement(s) in response to objection(s) made in the final office action.
  2. The amendment places the application in condition for allowance by rewriting objected-to claims in independent form.
  3. The amendment places the application in condition for allowance by incorporating limitations from objected-to claims into independent claims, if the new claim can be determined to be allowable with only a limited amount of further consideration or search.
  4. The amendment can be determined to place the application in condition for allowance with only a limited amount of further search or consideration, even if new claims are added without cancelling a corresponding number of finally rejected claims.
  5. The amendment can be determined to place the application in condition for allowance by adding new limitation(s) which require only a limited amount of further consideration or search.
  6. The response comprises a perfected 37 CFR 1.131 or 37 CFR 1.132 affidavit or declaration (i.e. a new declaration which corrects formal defects noted in a prior affidavit or declaration) which can be determined to place the application in condition for allowance with only a limited amount of further search or consideration

For utility, plant and reissue applications, the limited amount of time is three hours; for design applications, it is one hour. According to the USPTO, examiners will be encouraged to use their professional judgment to decide whether a response can be fully considered, including any additional search required, within the time limit in order to determine whether the application is in condition for allowance.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s